Letters to the Editor

TheCometwelcomes letters totheeditor responding toarticlesandeventsinthenews.Theymust includethe author'sname,addressandtelephonenumber.Theletter writer's name and city/town will appear in the paper - no exceptions. Letters must be 400 words or less in length.Please send your letters to:editor@carrollcountycomet. com; Letters to theEditor,Comet,P.O.Box 26, Flora, IN 46929 or P.O. Box 179, Delphi, IN 46923; or fax574-967-3384or765-564-2010.By submittingaletter or opinion article, the author grants the Comet the right topublish,distribute,archiveorusetheworkinprint, electronic, on-line or other format.

Are local government services for people or property?

The sudden public interest in property taxes and local governmentsmakesme think aboutwhat services local governments provide and for what purposes.Arecent report from the state's Department ofLocalGovernment Finance, "Report on Expenditures per Capita," openedmy eyes.

For example, of Indiana's 92 counties, Clay County had the lowest county government expenditures per person at $215.62, while Newton County had the highest at $2,809.40.Of the 1,008 Indiana townships with populations ranging from 44 to 167,055, Wabash Township in Gibson County had the highest per capita spendingwith $694.44 per person.

There are 293 Indiana school corporations with student populations ranging from only 30 to as many as 38,018 students. The highest per-student expenditure was River Forest Community School Corporation in Lake County at $17,072.96 and the lowest in the statewasWesternSchool Corporation inHoward County at $7,460.01 per student.

Obviously there is great variability in the level of services provided and many explanations for that variability. But I also wonder if itwouldmakemore sense to assess property taxes for services based on whether the services were relevant to the property.

Agriculture is different from other types of economic activity in that farmers are entirely dependent on land as a major component of our business cost. Farmers can't farm without farmland.Arguably, farmland does benefit frompolice, fire, roads, judicial, county administration and other services. But farmland does not use services for education,welfare, libraries, parks, airports, cemeteries ormany other services provided by local government.

To be fair, those are largely services for people, not property. In the coming discussions about howwe pay for government services, we should seriously considerwhether the service is relevant to the property use and property type.

Ironically, many local government services create demand for more and larger property protection services.Specifically, schools, libraries and other governmental buildings don't pay property taxes but do require increased police and fire protection services. Property taxpayers pay multiple times for those facilities: their initial construction, their debt service and their ongoing maintenance and protection.

So, aswe debate property taxes and local government services, I would ask our public policy decision makers this question: Are local government services oriented more toward people, or property? Howwe answer that questionwill directly influence howmuch property tax we will still be forced to pay.

DonVillwock, president

Indiana FarmBureau